No Child Left Inside Act Re-Introduced

First there was the book (Last Child in the Woods by Richard Louv). Then came the movement to get more kids outdoors. Now there's the bill—the No Child Left Inside Act (H.R. 2054/S.866)—recently introduced to Congress.

From the No Child Left Inside Coalition's press release:

Citing the critical need to improve environmental education across the country, The No Child Left Inside Coalition today applauded Senator Jack Reed (D-RI) and Congressman John Sarbanes (D-MD) for introducing the Senate and House versions of the historic No Child Left Inside Act (NCLI) on Earth Day 2009. The bi-partisan legislation, if passed, would mark the first environmental education legislation to pass Congress in more than 25 years.

“Passing the No Child Left Inside Act is a key step in improving the quality of our children’s education and preparing them for the complex challenges of the future workforce,” Senator Reed said.

Research shows that when environmental education is integrated into the curriculum, student achievement increases in core academic areas including science, math, and reading. Additional research finds that schools that teach the core subjects using the environment as an integrating context also demonstrate reduced discipline and classroom management problems; increased engagement and enthusiasm for learning; and greater student pride and ownership in accomplishments.

The bill authorizes new funding for states to provide high-quality, environmental instruction. Funds would support outdoor learning activities both at school and in non-formal environmental education centers, teacher professional development, and the creation of state environmental literacy plans.

Permalink | Comments (3) | Save & Share
Filed under: Environment

Comments

Explorer Robby
Senior Member
Joined: 4/20/08
Posts: 101
May 13, 2009 at 8:45 p.m. (EDT)

I really was interested in the "Last Child in the Woods" book. I agreed with much that the author said. I don't think I always agreed with where he was coming from, even though I agreed with where he ended up.

I am not opposed at all to , and in fact support, programs in school designed to get kids outside and interactive with nature. But I think those programs should be limited to doing just that, getting kids to interact with nature. You would have to walk a tight rope to keep "ideaology" out of the ciriculum. Teach kids to not be afraid of nature, and how to conduct themselves in nature. Let their parents teach them beliefs. I dont really trust any government mandates to do that.

 
f_klock
Moderator & Senior Member
Joined: 1/5/06
Posts: 624
May 14, 2009 at 6:29 a.m. (EDT)

Government mandates are not new. This bill isn't just about getting kids outside. There are national environmental education standards in place, that schools must meet. MANY do not. This bill may allocate additional funding for schools who have dropped EE programs, and provide the opportunity for organizations like the one I work for to step in and provide the education profile required to meet NEA/Govt. standards.

 
f_klock
Moderator & Senior Member
Joined: 1/5/06
Posts: 624
 

This post has been locked and is not accepting new comments