Re: E-85

Backcountry Forum

Topic 1967 of 2140: << Previous | Index | Next >>
Post: new topic (this topic is closed)
View: flat | threaded

Is anyone suggesting that we would be better off if Al Gore had not raised these issues and engaged in this debate, just because his carbon footprint doesn't match his rhetoric? If so, I think that demands a degree of perfection that we rarely see in anyone, let alone politicians.

I am reminded of Colin Fletcher in the Complete Walker railing against litterbugs but then admitting to having thrown a bottle out into the desert in a moment of weakness.

Let he who is without sin cast the first stone . . . .

Replies

View: flat | threaded

There have been no replies

Post a Reply

Before replying, please read the complete thread.

Topic options: view in flat mode start a new topic (this topic is closed)

 
More Topics
This forum: Older: sleeping bags may be unnecessary Newer: Kelty Footprints
All forums: Older: Sleeping Bags and Dogs dont get along Newer: Osprey Aether 60, REI UL 60, Gregory Z55