Re: building a campfire - sometimes it's just not right

Backcountry Forum

Topic 2011 of 2098: << Previous | Index | Next >>
Post: new topic (this topic is closed)
View: flat | threaded

As a Leave No Trace Trainer myself, I agree with you - to a point. LNT "SUGGESTS" that fires may not be necessary, and encourages alternative means of cooking and heating. Very different from a message such as DO NOT LITTER. "DO NOT" being the operative phrase here.

Hypothetically:
Let's say I find enough small fallen sticks along my trip to fuel my Sierra Stove. Yes, I agree, I changed something by picking them up. Yes there are carbon emmissions from my small fire. But - what impact is there to the earth to get an equivilent number of BTUs out of any type of fossil fuel. How many drilling platforms will it take. Even if it's just one, How much damage was done. I am of the opinion that the reduction of petroleum products of any kind is a big step in the right direction.

Now for another unsolicited opinion - Wood was meant to burn. Billions of acres of forest fires have burned naturally and unchecked for millions of years. This carbon emmission, the atmosphere could handle. After we began manufacturing "alternative" fossil fuels things went south.

Replies

View: flat | threaded

There have been no replies

Post a Reply

Before replying, please read the complete thread.

Topic options: view in flat mode start a new topic (this topic is closed)

 
More Topics
This forum: Older: Antarctica - How Backcountry is that? Newer: Last Child in the Woods –– Saving Our Children from Nature-Deficit Disorder
All forums: Older: WTS: SNUGPAK JACKET & Eagle MOLLE STYLE A-III-P - Tan Newer: Zipper is Leaking on Rain Fly