Re: building a campfire - sometimes it's just not right

Backcountry Forum

Topic 2011 of 2103: << Previous | Index | Next >>
Post: new topic (this topic is closed)
View: flat | threaded

Statistics, as the primary tool of social sciences, offer a useful, and probably the only means of interpreting the impact of users on the back country.

Regarding both risk and environmental issues, they provide the "big picture," and are truly essential in both the insurance and financial industries, to say nothing of public safety agencies, and even outdoor retailers and advertisers.

To doubt their utility and meaning, would be, to say the least, intellectually very unsound.

Of course, if somebody trashes a campsite, or unwittingly tries somehow, to commit suicide in the wilderness, statistics won't absolve them from personal responsibility.

With regard to campfires, obviously scarring the land or burning it down is something that does happen, unfortunately, and is to be seriously discouraged.

But it may be that the average hiker causes greater damage to the environment simply by driving their car to a trailhead or to their job, or the supermarket. Personally, wilderness novice and poseur that I am, walk to work.


----

Replies

View: flat | threaded

There have been no replies

Post a Reply

Before replying, please read the complete thread.

Topic options: view in flat mode start a new topic (this topic is closed)

 
More Topics
This forum: Older: Antarctica - How Backcountry is that? Newer: Last Child in the Woods –– Saving Our Children from Nature-Deficit Disorder
All forums: Older: WTS: SNUGPAK JACKET & Eagle MOLLE STYLE A-III-P - Tan Newer: Zipper is Leaking on Rain Fly