Re: The NEW Ten Essentials

Backcountry Forum

Topic 2047 of 2098: << Previous | Index | Next >>
Post: new topic (this topic is closed)
View: flat | threaded

The perspective of the "ten essentials" list was stated in the article: "The purpose of this list has always been to answer two basic questions: First, can you respond positively to an accident or emergency? Second, can you safely spend a night—or more—out?" Although "lots of people" may have died in the wilderness despite having the ten essentials, they probably died from a severe injury, a heart attack, or some other occurrence outside the purview of the ten essentials. It's not likely that someone with adequate shelter or clothing died from exposure or hypothermia; it's not likely that someone with adequate food and water died from thirst or starvation.

Who is the "self-annointed expert" to which you refer?

Replies

View: flat | threaded

There have been no replies

Post a Reply

Before replying, please read the complete thread.

Topic options: view in flat mode start a new topic (this topic is closed)

 
More Topics
This forum: Older: The Future... Newer: New Brashears video on Everest 1996
All forums: Older: 3 season tent Newer: high dump on the bruce peninsula: anyone been