Synthetic Vs. Down

Gear Selection Forum

Topic 9 of 480: << Previous | Index | Next >>

Post: new topic (this topic is closed)

View: flat | threaded

Posted by Soloist on September 12, 2006 at 7:15:08 pm EDT

I've heard good things about Synthetics: Cheaper and when wet they keep they're rating and dry easy.

Down bags are lighter more compressable and last longer. But are more expensive and are useless once wet and don't dry out easy.

I've been using a Synthetic bag but i'm going to replace it soon. So i'm open to suggestions/opinons.

View: flat | threaded

Re: Synthetic Vs. Down - lambertiana 23:22:34 09/13/2006
- Re: Synthetic Vs. Down - Bill S 18:09:31 09/14/2006
  - Re: Synthetic Vs. Down - alan 13:02:49 09/15/2006
    - Re: Synthetic Vs. Down - Soloist 15:45:25 09/16/2006
      - Re: Synthetic Vs. Down - Tom D 16:37:33 09/16/2006
        Re: Synthetic Vs. Down - Ian (Guest) 15:18:56 10/17/2006
        Re: Synthetic Vs. Down - Bill S 17:31:20 10/17/2006
        Re: Synthetic Vs. Down - SteveTheFolkie 14:19:18 11/13/2006
  - Re: Synthetic Vs. Down - Chumango 20:37:49 09/14/2006
Re: Synthetic Vs. Down - alan 13:46:35 09/13/2006
- Re: Synthetic Vs. Down - Ed G 19:13:04 09/13/2006
Re: Synthetic Vs. Down - Bill S 00:52:17 09/13/2006

Before replying, please read the complete thread.

Topic options: view in flat mode start a new topic (this topic is closed)

More Topics
This forum: Older: backpack comparison Newer: ultralight stoves
All forums: Older: Survivorman Newer: Help! Looking for TNF Steep Tech Moto 98