Re: Osprey Atmos 65

Gear Selection Forum

Topic 247 of 480: << Previous | Index | Next >>
Post: new topic (this topic is closed)
View: flat | threaded

I made an error in my last post. I meant 50 liter packs are too large, probably much too large, for overhead bins in airlines; that's 3000 cubic inches -- not 5000 cubic inches as I mistakenly wrote.

A 6500 cubic inch pack is entirely out of the question as a carry-on, if that's your question. For that matter, so is a 5000 cubic inch pack.

I'd say anything more than a daypack is too much, but I'm a fanatic and invariably restrict myself to a waistpack for the sake of efficient boarding.

My personal method for air travel, born of utterly pitiful inexperience, is to pack a pack, of whatever size, empty and inside a duffle bag, which I check rather than checking the thing itself as a piece of luggage. If nothing else, the pack straps seem vulnerable on conveyer belts.

Other reasons have to do with packing aggrievation and protecting equipment.

Replies

View: flat | threaded

There have been no replies

Post a Reply

Before replying, please read the complete thread.

Topic options: view in flat mode start a new topic (this topic is closed)

 
More Topics
This forum: Older: Soft Shell Jackets Newer: Choice of down or synthetic bags for long hike in cold
All forums: Older: Study Shows Heat Accelerates BPA Release Newer: Building a Better Water Bottle: Aluminum, Steel, and No BPA