12:44 p.m. on January 29, 2009 (EST)
Couple of comments -
A. The Garmin Foretrex and Forerunner series of wrist GPSRs are intended as training instruments and not for navigation. I have a Forerunner 305, which I use for training hikes and bike rides. I have figured out a way of hacking it for navigation, but it is really unsatisfactory for that, even when following a pre-loaded route. The Suunto X10 and their other GPS-equipped golf and marine racing "wrist computers" have the same deficiency - good for the sport and reasonable for downloading your track to the computer after the outing, but not for navigation. Even the basic "yellow" eTrex or Magellan's basic eXplorist 100 are better for navigation than the wrist GPSRs. The Foretrex is awfully huge on your wrist, as well - I have seen people catch them on bushes and even their pack straps when putting the pack on or off.
B. I would not get any of Garmin's "S" series, such as the 60CSx. The "S" stands for "sensor", which means they have a flux-gate compass and a barometric altimeter. The problems are (1) these are battery eaters (that is, much shorter battery life); (2) the compass requires frequent recalibration, and gets decalibrated by changing batteries, any radio frequency interference, such as using a cell phone, ham radio handheld or FRS/GMRS, or even just the electronic ignition system of a number of cars and trucks; (3) in the units with the barometric altimeter, the display shows only the barometric altitude, which means you need to recalibrate it frequently, either at known altitude points (use your map!), the known barometer setting (available when you are close to an airport and have a radio that has aircraft bands or can phone the airport's ATIS), or tell the GPSR to calibrate on the current GPS-derived altitude (you can't choose to show the GPS-derived altitude all the time). Though it won't affect most people, the barometric altitude has a basic problem in high latitudes that stems from the altitude/air pressure profile being different from that profile at lower latitudes - for example, in Antarctica, my 60CSx insisted that High Camp on Vinson (12,000 ft physical altitude) was at 13,500, no matter how I tried to recalibrate the unit.
Another problem with Garmin's units is that they will not work properly with lithium AA batteries. Some of the older ones said they did in the manual, but Garmin changed their minds. My 60CSx shuts off immediately with the lithiums when you try to turn it on (the voltage of lithium AAs is slightly higher than alkalines or NiMH). This is a problem for people like me who go out in cold weather, where lithium AAs work much better than alkalines.
C. There is a way to get an authorization to use the Garmin software on a desktop and a laptop, with the restriction that only one can be used at a time. Talk to Garmin tech support about this (their tech support people can be pretty hard to deal with, and like many tech support departments, can be surprisingly ignorant of their own product at times).
D. Magellan has had a number of problems with the Triton series. However, their rep at the OR Winter Show last week told me that the latest software/firmware release has resolved all the problems. The Triton is a great design, and the capability of loading National Geographic Topo! maps as well as their proprietary maps is an excellent feature. For a physically smaller unit, you might consider the eXplorist series. The 500 has a lot of capability and features in grey shades, with the 600 having the same in color. I use the 500 a lot, though I would prefer that it have AA batteries as an alternative to the rechargeable lithium, instead of AAA.
E. Two alternatives to look at are the Delorme PN-40 and the new series from Lowrance. Lowrance is a long-time player in the GPSR world, but is just getting back into the handheld market. They have great reputation and their new units that they had at the OR Show look very interesting, with good maps. Delorme is a long-time player in the map world, with their Street Atlas being by far the best computerized street maps on the market. Their TopoUSA is quite good, though not as good as NatGeo's Topo!. Both can be loaded onto the PN-40. The predecessor PN-20 (which I have) is terribly slow if you load lots of maps into it, but the PN-40 has overcome the speed and capacity limitations (it takes the high capacity memory cards). You can load not only both street and topo maps (the topos are from TopoUSA, including the 1:24,000 series, and street from Street Atlas), but also satellite and aerial photos. These make a lot of navigation really easy (imagine following the animal trails when heading cross-country, since they are easy to see on the aerial photos).