12:41 p.m. on October 6, 2010 (EDT)
Ed,
Thanks for the kind words and over-the-top praise ("real deal"? Who, me? Naah, I'm just an Old GreyBearded One who has managed to survive close to 7 decades blundering around in the woods and hills, all too often in overly risky situations, on 6 of the seven continents so far, in mountain ranges, deserts, jungles, and swamps. Seriously, I do NOT consider myself an expert - I learn or re-learn too much each time I go out there to believe that I know even a quarter of what I really need to know)
rvn,
I'm sorry you took offense. Your initial questions and responses indicated that you had little experience or background. While I haven't been to the Caucasus or Urals, I have some familiarity with them from climbing partners and friends who have. From my experiences in mountains and winter conditions in several parts of the world, I would caution that different areas can differ in major ways. Just here in North America, a winter ski tour in the Cascades (Pacific Northwest), the Alaska Range, the Sierra, the Tetons, Colorado Rockies, and the New England mountains (the Presidentials in New Hampshire or Adirondacks) can encounter immensely different conditions. Even between the British Columbia Coast Range and the Canadian Rockies conditions are very different. Some of these have the snowfall as light, fluffy powder, some as hardened windslab (often with layers of corn snow), some with rain-hardened slab (sometimes with hoarfrost layers between slabs), sometimes slush layers. In some of those areas, the snow can be quite stable, while in others the stability can change immensely in just 24 hours.
In the Sierra, because conditions are so rapidly changeable, deep snow may or may not be stable. It is not unusual to dig a snowpit and find a soft powdery layer a couple feet thick on top of an ice layer (formed by rain having fallen on snow after a sunny spell) on top of a granular, loose layer on top of wind slab on top of another loose granular layer.
Because the Sierra are the first really high range from the Pacific Coast and the latitude is such that the jet stream can shift by hundreds of miles north and south in just a few days during winter, we get storms some winters that dump 5 to 10 meters of snow in 3 or 4 days (the world record snowfall from a single storm was recorded at Blue Canyon along Interstate Highway 80 between Sacramento, California and Donner Pass, where the ill-fated Donner Party was trapped for several months by huge storms). Such storms typically only happen once every few years, not several times a winter (dependent on a phenomenon called El Nino, a shifting ocean current in the Pacific Ocean). At the other extreme, we can get fairly dry winters, during which you could almost hike the entire JMT on dry ground during anytime from November through January. February almost always gets one or two storms that dump a meter or two of snow.
Put in meteorological terms, most of the Sierra winter snowfall comes from maritime air masses, though occasionally with shifts in the jet, some comes from continental air masses. Most of the maritime masses come out of the Gulf of Alaska, though some are tropical (these usually bring rain on top of the snow, or heavy, wet snow, referred to as "Sierra concrete"). As I recall, the Caucasus gets primarily continental air masses, with the northern Urals getting maritime air masses off the Arctic Ocean, which because the air is fairly cold, still produces a more powdery snow than what we see in the Cascades and Sierra.
My basic message is that each mountain range is unique, with the Sierra in particular being subject to a highly variable winter climate. This means slopes that are more unstable and subject to significant avalanches than in many other parts of the world, especially wet snow and slab.
The permits are the least of the problems to be solved. Just contact the Inyo National Forest and Sequoia-Kings Canyon National Park offices directly via phone or email.