5:56 p.m. on April 15, 2012 (EDT)
I'm not sure what your target audience would be but let's say it was someone who wanted to know something about the area and how to go about safe camping etc:
I think the audio was good, except for the changes in volume. For the second half of video 2, I had volume on full on my computer and still had to get closer to the speakers.
As for editing, only you would really know what was essential or what the message was. Some was a bit long, some ok in duration: I learned something about washing off any poison ivy and not touching your face etc, but for me it would have been better to have you switch to voiceover and a shorter clip for that. Whereas, if I had never used a liquid fuel stove before, the entire clip was ok, as it was necessary to see exactly how long it is going to take for a prime of the stove before letting the gas go on to full. (I have never seen that stick-used-to-light trick before - neat.)
One of the ways to keep people with short attention spans interested is to use different camera angles and chop them up and pair it with a continuous audio or voiceover. That takes time in the field however. The other way is 'soundbites' but I question whether or not there would be much learning in that method.
Generally, I would like the camera closer whenever you are doing/demonstrating stuff. Pulling back for 'nature' representations, or when you are walking out of the fixed frame. Have you tried walking towards and away from the tripod, especially on any path sections, to make it look like a journey? (Go forward, drop off camera, go back then walk to camera and away from camera, then go back and retrieve camera.) That often helps set the scene (and takes up time!).
I hope that helps. Personally, I find video really time consuming to make and stressful to edit, simply because to keep people happy, most of it has to end up on the 'cutting room floor', especially these days with shorter attention spans.
***
I think polarising filters are best for either cutting off reflections (wet leaves after rain etc) or making colours look more saturated under certain conditions?I thought UV filters became unnecessary a while back, as film became less sensitive and sensors were not problematic? But with video, I don't know. A clear protective filter might do, meaning more light and contrast getting through, especially if you are stacking the two filters already. With all the bug sprays, a protective filter might make sense as a default?
It is always time to upgrade processors, it seems. Octo-core!
I like those instant porridge sachets (I can do 3 if I am really hungry, though acid reflux often follows!) and I am onto 'chocolate brownie' flavour these days, which sounds disgusting, I know. Though I can't do it with water, I have to add some powdered milk.
Altogether, I enjoyed the video and learned some stuff.
Thanks, Jon.