Welcome, guest [login | register]

Posted by johnlvs2runn (Guest) on October 12, 2005 at 3:55:43 pm EDT
In reply to Re: Sawyer recommended *against* posted by Brian in SLC on October 7, 2005 at 6:49:15 pm EDT

Fine let's have all treatments be the same cost then.

$20 per treatment should be enough.

After all the antivenom doesn't cost much more than this anyway, if that.

And regarding the studies, what "studies". I haven't seen one credible study that proves antivenom is better than anything else. The medical line that's better than tying your arm up for 5 hours while cutting it apart and/or dying is not much of an alternative is it. That's a close minded attitude. Sure the anti venom is also better than getting run over by a truck.

I don't buy those arguments.

Show me the methods that work and that are NOT based only on profits.

Replies

View: flat | threaded

• Re: Sawyer recommended *against* - Brian in SLC 02:03:28 10/19/2005
  • Re: Sawyer recommended *against* - johnlvs2run 14:36:18 06/07/2006
    • Re: Sawyer recommended *against* - Dave 14:53:55 06/07/2006
• Re: Sawyer recommended *against* - Bill S 18:40:35 10/12/2005

Post a Reply

Before replying, please read the complete thread.