bivvy sack

Gear Selection Forum

Topic 88 of 388: << Previous | Index | Next >>
Post: new topic (this topic is closed)
View: flat | threaded

Most or even all bivvy sacks are about 15% too small. There's no excuse for this. They all want to save weight.

I've used a one-pound non-waterproof bivvy sack about 20 nights a year for four years. It nicely protects my two very light sleeping bags, adds warmth, and sometimes I just use warm underwear.. with sack... I use tarp shelters, and have mostly now given up groundsheets and also stuff sack due to bivvy sack's usefulness, and/or my chronic forgetfulness........

The top part of sack is water repellant and I haven't found condensation much of a problem. OR discontinued this model, and now all I can see are Goretex or similar. Don't know if they breath as good. I may need a new one in a couple of years.

Replies

View: flat | threaded

Post a Reply

Before replying, please read the complete thread.

Topic options: view in flat modestart a new topic (this topic is closed)

 
More Topics
This forum: Older: Outfitter in Portland Newer: Water Bottle filter
All forums: Older: need footprint for mountainhardwear skyview 2 tent Newer: waterproofing degradation