Re: E-85

Backcountry Forum

Topic 1967 of 2140: << Previous | Index | Next >>
Post: new topic (this topic is closed)
View: flat | threaded

Bill,

You really don't answer my question: would we be better off if Al Gore had not addressed these issues?

I don't think so.

Would we be better off if her reduced his consumption? Of course. But don't demonize him for his private consumption while ignoring those who set public policies that have a far greater global impact than a thousand Al Gore's could ever have.

If you follow your reasoning to its logical conclusion, then we should just ignore the message because the messenger isn't performing as we expect he should.

I never suggested that we should not point out Al Gore's faults--but neither should we forget the valuable service he has performed and continues to perform.

"Physician, heal thyself" indeed. Would you refuse necessary heart surgery from an overweight but highly skilled surgeon? I think not.

Replies

View: flat | threaded

There have been no replies

Post a Reply

Before replying, please read the complete thread.

Topic options: view in flat mode start a new topic (this topic is closed)

 
More Topics
This forum: Older: sleeping bags may be unnecessary Newer: Kelty Footprints
All forums: Older: Sleeping Bags and Dogs dont get along Newer: Osprey Aether 60, REI UL 60, Gregory Z55