Welcome, guest [login | register]

Posted by kutenay on February 20, 2008 at 5:15:09 pm EST
In reply to Bears, Bears, Bears posted by Timeportalmatrix on August 5, 2007 at 12:57:20 pm EDT

My question would be, exactly what professional qualifications does Calamity possess to "peer-review" the work in question? He states that it is ...probably some of the best work of it's kind...and ...It would probably remain fairly accurate..., etc. as though HE has the scientific qualifications and field experience to judge this accurately.

Frankly, I do not think that Calamity HAS such a basis for his opinions and I knew Herrero not long after he came to Canada. I have about everything he has written and have read his and many other's scientific and popular treatises on Grizzlies over and over again, yet, I am ...merely cranky...

Yeah, sure, I am although I was dealing with Grizzlies as part of my employment years before Herrero ever saw his first one. Herrero is NOT the ultimate authority on Grizzlies, far from it and this study simply shows his and Tom Smith's willingness to skew data to fit THEIR political agenda concerning Grizzlies. I do not consider this sound science at all.

Replies

View: flat | threaded

There have been no replies

Post a Reply

Before replying, please read the complete thread.