A natural water filter

3:35 a.m. on March 5, 2014 (EST)
TOP 25 REVIEWER REVIEW CORPS
773 reviewer rep
679 forum posts

Nature's (disposable) water filter. As a plant physiologist I can say that this would probably work in removing bacteria, but only with certain types of wood. Oaks and other ring porous species have long, wide vessels that could let some bacteria/protozoans through. The researchers used Eastern white pine -- conifers have a different wood structure where water has to pass through a lot of the kind of pit membranes shown in the picture at the top of the article, so they would be the best bet. You'd want to watch for leakage around the tube-wood seal. I suspect the setup shown would be extremely slow and so you would want a gravity feed and some time on your hands or a squeeze system to speed it up. We use a similar set-up to measure the hydraulic conductivity of twig samples, only up to about 5mm in diameter, but with a 1 m head you get only a few drops a minute even with species with high conductivity. Shorter, fatter twig sections should work better than the opposite. I can't take it too seriously (yet) but it's an intriguing idea and I may play around with it just for fun.

http://bit.ly/1hGv5BR

PS: I took a look at the published article in PLOS ONE. It's by a group at MIT and very thorough. They specifically say that conifers should be used, and include a diagram showing how wood of other kinds of trees can let bacteria through. They used compressed nitrogen to drive water through the wood, at a pressure of about 5 psi, about what you'd get with 3.5 meters of hydraulic head (so you'd need a long piece of tubing to get that kind of pressure) to get a flow rate of a bit less than 5 ml/minute, so it would take over 3 hours to get a liter of water. Hmm -- clearly requires some tinkering.

6:35 p.m. on March 15, 2014 (EDT)
12 reviewer rep
843 forum posts

Ill keep my katadyn.

7:43 p.m. on March 21, 2014 (EDT)
MODERATOR REVIEW CORPS
998 reviewer rep
3,495 forum posts

I heard about this on National Public radio the other day, really neat.

Would 3.5 meters of hydraulic head convert to 3.5 meters of tubing, or is it figured differently?

Thanks for post and the link too.

12:32 p.m. on March 23, 2014 (EDT)
MODERATOR TOP 10 REVIEWER REVIEW CORPS
6,276 reviewer rep
828 forum posts

I heard the same story, Mike. Certainly not a quick method.

4:31 p.m. on March 23, 2014 (EDT)
TOP 25 REVIEWER REVIEW CORPS
773 reviewer rep
679 forum posts

Yes, 3.5 m of tubing if it is completely vertical. Could possibly speed it up with bigger diameter and shorter branch sectios. Thevtubing coul be quite small diameter if you step it up on either end. Who knows?

October 21, 2014
Quick Reply

Please sign in to reply

 
More Topics
This forum: Older: Lets not bring Las Vegas to the Grand Canyon Newer: HIking the PCT Alone
All forums: Older: John Wayne Pioneer trail day hike Newer: gregory packs?