Re: OH NO! THEY'RE BAAACCCKKK!

Climbing Forum

Topic 843 of 868: << Previous | Index | Next >>
Post: new topic (this topic is closed)
View: flat | threaded

FMD, I don't watch "prime time TV", whatever that is, so I don't know what you are talking about. The only thing I watch on the commercial channels is the local evening news (and not often then). I do occasionally watch PBS, History, Discovery, NASA, NatGeo, VS (when they have bike races on), and a few others.

Unfortunately, History and Discovery (owned by the same company, I understand) have taken to showing fiction (like the Everest thing) as if it were factual. Same with some formerly reasonable magazines. The result is that the general public believes this junk is true, with the Discovery Everest program as a prime example. Yeah, yeah, so there was a real climb on Everest by the Hells Angel and the woman who had never climbed anything before. But the hype and emphasis on "extreme" and gross distortions that come through the selective editing, and all that means that the public does not realize that what is being portrayed is all the wrong reasons to go climbing, and that done right, climbing even on Everest is safer than driving on the freeways.

Replies

View: flat | threaded

There have been no replies

Post a Reply

Before replying, please read the complete thread.

Topic options: view in flat mode start a new topic (this topic is closed)

 
More Topics
This forum: Older: Vulgarian Digest Newer: Pico De Orizaba
All forums: Older: Anyone with an MH Casa or Trango series tent? Newer: looking for a pack