Backpacker Magazine

10:44 a.m. on August 7, 2013 (EDT)
MODERATOR TOP 10 REVIEWER REVIEW CORPS
6,425 reviewer rep
845 forum posts

I received my latest issue of Backpacker Magazine this week and was thrilled to see my favorite Illinois trail, the River-to-River Trail written up.

They only featured a section of the trail, but I was AMAZED at how much information they got wrong in this short write-up.

They listed High Knob as a small town. Wrong--it's a hill, the highest point on the trail.

They state you must cache water near Garden of the Gods, because there is none. Wrong--there's a public campground .2 miles off the trail. I've filled my water bottles with potable water there many times.

Finally, they route you to Camp Cadiz for pick-up. Wrong--that section of the trail has been closed and rerouted for 4-5 years. It's not maintained, and it's not well-marked.

I'm curious if anyone else has ever read a BPM article and thought, "That's not the trail I hike!" or if this is an anomaly?

11:40 a.m. on August 7, 2013 (EDT)
0 reviewer rep
172 forum posts

I stopped getting that magazine yrs ago and haven't look back. I do remember when backpacker magazine put hiking cards in the magazine. The ones I saw weren't even close to what the trail was really like.

12:51 p.m. on August 7, 2013 (EDT)
210 reviewer rep
4,245 forum posts

Have you contacted the editors to tell them of your findings?  I read articles at their online web link http://www.backpacker.com/ now and then.

Which area are you talking about at this link? http://www.backpacker.com/destinations/category/149 Its for Illinois 

1:17 p.m. on August 7, 2013 (EDT)
TOP 10 REVIEWER REVIEW CORPS
1,994 reviewer rep
437 forum posts

I must have signed up on their website for some reason a few years back because they email me all the time.  I read everything with some skepticism, but definitely apply a double dose to most stuff I read on their site.  They seem to be more about looking the part than really providing good information.

10:24 p.m. on August 7, 2013 (EDT)
210 reviewer rep
4,245 forum posts

As long as backpacker mag has been around, I am betting the kids that run it now just are'nt as knowledgeable about actual hiking, maybe? Like park rangers that are only called back country rangers by title not by wilderness knowledge. I have met many over the years in a parks I have hiked in that new only what they had been told or read.

I never signed up to outside or backpacker, I just read the online mags.

10:59 p.m. on August 7, 2013 (EDT)
0 reviewer rep
374 forum posts

I still get the print magazine.  Since I am familiar with a lot of the southern Sierra, I can say that their trip ideas are hit and miss.  Sometimes they do a good job, but other times they vastly understate the difficulty of the route.  Sometimes they have trips that involve some significant off trail over tricky class 2 passes with a lot of very loose talus, and they don't even mention that.

Their writers are also not dendrologists.  They often have difficulty correctly identifying the trees on the routes.  The outdoor writer with the Fresno Bee has the same problem.

11:40 p.m. on August 7, 2013 (EDT)
BRAND REP REVIEW CORPS
2,003 reviewer rep
476 forum posts

Ooph. 

Dare I say I was considering GOTG to be my fall solo trip?

That said, I do wind up going, I'm coming straight to you, Jeffery, and sending my monthly copy of "Backpacker" straight to the recycling bin.

Goes to show you, better to ask the folks who've done it than those who're assigned to it for a quick-'n-easy magazine feature.

Heck, quite simply, sometimes it's best to ask the natives. I'd find it hard to believe a staff writer from the Land of Lincoln would make that big a goof. Or several of them.

4:47 p.m. on August 8, 2013 (EDT)
10 reviewer rep
479 forum posts

I subscribed to it when it was a monthly and when it first came out.


It had some good information a the price.

They raised the price... ok still some value.



Then it was no longer a monthly magazine (every other) by effectively doubling the price.

The value wasn't there and the information was at times spotty. Could get better information from here (then Rec Hiking/backpacking on news service)

Ah well. 

9:44 a.m. on August 9, 2013 (EDT)
210 reviewer rep
4,245 forum posts

I only look at anything these days in towns online. My job pays for everything. But soon I will be heading outdoors to live free again, money stays in the banks in town. In 40 years I will be either 97 or dead from exposure. Food for scavengers 

9:14 a.m. on August 11, 2013 (EDT)
0 reviewer rep
1,083 forum posts

When Backpacker first came out it was bi-monthly, 6 issues a year.  I have a set of the first 10 years of the magazine.  I don't know what they publish now.  They may have gone to monthly during the 80's.

11:29 a.m. on August 11, 2013 (EDT)
1,631 reviewer rep
3,962 forum posts

I got a chuckle out of the description on their site of the LHHT. Especially where they say take a dip in Machine Run...

"Start day four with a quick splash in Machine Run"

Uh, yeah...

Machine Run is a dried up creek bed full of rocks. I cannot remember a time when there has actually been enough water in it to dip anything including(but not limited too) the inlet hose for my filter. 

Nevertheless, I have been a subscriber for quite some time. 

I often find myself completely disagreeing with their gear reviews quite regularly when it comes to a product that I own and have experience with. 

I find a lot of their reviews more manufacturer driven as opposed to consumer driven. 

The info?

Well that is questionable at times as well. 

1:35 p.m. on August 11, 2013 (EDT)
21 reviewer rep
1,223 forum posts

I hope none of my favorite trails are even mentioned in "Backpacker."

The rag reads like it is written in New York by journalists.

6:57 a.m. on August 12, 2013 (EDT)
210 reviewer rep
4,245 forum posts

I  wonder why those of you who subscribe to Backpacker but find so many problems with info that you still subscribe. As I said I look at the free online edition once in a while.

8:16 a.m. on August 12, 2013 (EDT)
MODERATOR TOP 10 REVIEWER REVIEW CORPS
6,425 reviewer rep
845 forum posts

GaryPalmer said:

I  wonder why those of you who subscribe to Backpacker but find so many problems with info that you still subscribe. As I said I look at the free online edition once in a while.

 Well, it's the first time I've subscribed to it, and it was only $12 for a 2-year subscription. Until I read the R2R description, I was unaware of the content.

10:20 a.m. on August 13, 2013 (EDT)
210 reviewer rep
4,245 forum posts

R2R you mean the Grand Canyon? I have hiked the R2R hike many times, once (the first time) in 7 hours , but usually taking my time and staying at the three public/hikers campgrounds along the way. There are so many side trips and it makes the hike more enjoyable.

There was a guy who worked on the south rim who could run the 23 miles R2R in 3 hours. 

November 1, 2014
Quick Reply

Please sign in to reply

 
More Topics
This forum: Older: How do you ID yourself when in the woods, or whatever you do in the natural world Newer: Whats you history outdoors or/and why do you go outdoors?
All forums: Older: Trailspace Sticker on Lolo Pass! Newer: Outdoor watches