Reviews

5

I believe the shoe is best for technical trails (sandy,…

Rating: rated 4.5 of 5 stars
Source: bought it new
Price Paid: $125 before discount

Summary

I believe the shoe is best for technical trails (sandy, rocky, dry powdery dirt trails, and muddy slippery trails). I have used them in all of the above conditions and have been very pleased. They are great for more groomed trails as well, but seem to really excel in the tougher conditions. They could be used on the road but it would be a waste of their excellent traction.

I would recommend them to anyone running technical trails, especially the rocky and sometimes sandy stuff we get here in Utah. While they have lots of cushioning they are still very light and are great for doing longer trail runs. I have had them about 250 miles and feel like they will be done and ready for retirement around 500 miles.

Pros

  • Traction, they have plenty of it
  • Cushioning to take the abuse instead of your feet
  • Breathability, it's hot out west and they breathe and drain well
  • Minimal drop, one of the reasons you buy Hokas, right?

Cons

  • Sides of the shoe are starting to lose their finish/color
  • Insoles bunch up at the heel, could be a problem for some
  • Over time the laces seem to not pull tight as easily. They get hung up as they wear due to use, sand, dirt, etc.

Fit: I have a narrow foot so I do have to pull the laces somewhat tight. Not so tight the eyelets come close to each other or anything. I do have to be careful to not over tighten the top of the shoe.

A lot of folks change out the lacing for speed laces or a different type. I didn't but can see why some would. The laces are OK, but not great and seem to fight you the more wear they get.

Comfort: I ran pretty far in them the first day I had them. They were great right out of the box. I run with gaiters on the trails around my house. If I didn't I would be dumping a lot of sand/dirt out of them. I think that is more related to the trails in Utah then any issue with the shoe. 

Support: They are a fairly neutral shoe. I don't find them under or over supportive. 

Water Resistance: Not at all but they drain well.

Traction: I find them to have great traction in all conditions the summer has thrown at them. Not sure how great they would be on ice, but I would use the pull-on traction products anyway.

Temp Control: They breathe great for summer. I can't say how they would do in the winter/cooler months. My guess is they breathe too well for cold weather.

Ease of Use: Pretty straightforward. Again the laces seem sub par or less than to me. 

Features: Traction and cushioning

Construction and Durability: Sides of the outsole are flaking off their coloring pretty quickly. Doesn't seem to impact performance but has occurred in the first 200 miles of use. One last time, the laces aren't great. 
IMG_1140.jpg

Conditions: Sandy, rocky, dusty, hilly trails of Utah for about 250 miles. I don't use them on the road at all.

IMG_1096.jpg

IMG_1106.jpg

IMG_1111.jpg

IMG_1074.jpg

IMG_0737.jpg

IMG_0735.jpg


IMG_0770.jpg



IMG_0773.jpg

IMG_0823.jpg


IMG_0816.jpg                         

Alicia TRAILSPACE STAFF

Thanks for sharing your helpful Hoka review, James. I'd love to see some pictures of your pair and where you run in them if possible. Thanks!


2 years ago
Alicia TRAILSPACE STAFF

Nice pictures, James. Thanks for sharing them. Now I want to head back outside for a run.


2 years ago
G00SE MODERATOR

Great review. The soles of this shoe look so odd to me. You mentioned you ran with them right out of the box. I'm curious if they felt weird at first?


2 years ago
James Glenn Bradley

Alicia, every time I look at photos of where other folks live and run it makes me feel like I need to go run or should go run. I have stop myself sometimes and remember I either just ran or will later. Nice to know it happens to others:)


2 years ago
James Glenn Bradley

Goose, they felt fine but I did notice the lugs/sole really gripping/making noise as I walked across the asphalt parking lot to the trail head. The sole seems to be mostly blown rubber so I do wonder if they will hold up as long as shoes with carbon rubber? That is part of the appeal of the Speed Goat that just came out and why I wan to try them as well. The lugs are very soft/flexible on the Challenger. I could see any amount of road running really wearing down the traction prematurely.


2 years ago
Alicia TRAILSPACE STAFF

Ha ha, glad I'm not the only one who feels that way seeing people's running pictures.


2 years ago
2

The Hoka one one Meta-Rocker totally changed my training…

Rating: rated 4.5 of 5 stars
Source: received it as a sample, freebie, or prize (Received a sample of this product from Backbone Media for purposes of this review)

Summary

The Hoka one one Meta-Rocker totally changed my training and hiking experience by relieving pain and neuropathy in my right foot. Super cushiony underfoot and a wide sole for stability. Excellent breathability.

Pros

  • Very soft underfoot
  • Lightweight
  • Meta-Rocker
  • Breathability

Cons

  • None yet

After hearing all the buzz about Hoka one one shoes on hiking forums I was pretty excited when I was offered a pair to test and review. While the Challenger ATR is a trail running shoe I have used it almost exclusively for gym training on the treadmill and hiking in my local Northern California state parks.

I found a size 9 was true to length and the width would be medium. I have a wide foot so I wear a thinner sock when wearing these shoes. Fitment was good from the start, snug without being tight and quite comfortable during my 60-90 minute sessions. The shoe has a rather deep insole which keeps the foot well centered in the shoe.

This shoe is very soft underfoot which works great on the treadmill, whether walking fast or running, incline or decline. From the start the neuropathy that had always occurred in the ball of my right foot when training became nonexistent.

It took a while for me to figure out what was making the difference. It became apparent that the Meta-Rocker under the middle of the shoe was changing the way my foot struck the ground. Looking at the shoe in profile, both the heel and the toe are bent up from the midsole. Being a heel striker, the rocker was smoothing the transition from my heel to the ball of my foot.
IMG_6775.jpg

IMG_6784.jpg


Taking them out on the trails, the lugged soles have worked well on the dry dirt trails in my area and so far are holding up well. The soles flair out from the shoe's uppers and that provides a nice stable platform. The toe has a nice rubber bumper which comes in handy when an obstacle is struck because I'm not paying attention. Breathability during trail hikes has been good. 

I have been using these shoes for 4 months now and I will be sticking with Hoka for my training shoes for the foreseeable future.

Disclosure: I received a sample of this product for the purposes of this review, but the opinions expressed are my own.

John Compisi MEDIA

They look very comfortable and light. Are they?


7 months ago
Steve Mullen MEDIA

Super comfortable and pretty lightweight, certainly lighter than the Sketchers I was using.


7 months ago
FromSagetoSnow

I met a guy who hikes everywhere in these and he swears by them. Not the best looking shoes but they sound like great performers.


7 months ago
1

I got the shoe in December to start incorporating…

Rating: rated 4 of 5 stars
Source: bought it new
Price Paid: $130

Summary

I got the shoe in December to start incorporating them into training for the HURT 100 in Hawaii. They did great on the frozen trails and winter back roads of Maine. But I was still not sure how this would correspond to the heavily rooted technical running on Oahu.

After multiple 20 mile training runs on the HURT course as well as using them for 85 miles during the race I can say they withstood everything I threw at them.

Pros

  • Light weight
  • Increased cushion during long runs
  • Versatile through different conditions

Cons

  • Cost
  • Some bunching of the insole in the heel
  • Premature wear on the upper specifically through the toe box

Specs:

  • Purpose: Trail
  • Offset: 5mm
  • Heel: 29mm
  • Forefoot: 24mm
  • Weight: 8.6 oz. size 9 

Fit: Typically I am a size 9. These tend to run a half size large, so 8.5 Men's.

Comfort: Very comfortable shoe. They achieve increased cushion while maintaining a low weight 

Support: Adequate 

Water Resistance: Not particularly water resistance, but they do drain well

Traction: Well thought out tread pattern that is effective over multiple conditions 

Temp Control: Breathable 

Construction Durability: 500+ miles on them and will probably get around 600 miles before retiring them.

Conditions: I have used these on frozen trails, roads, humid jungle, Southwestern rocky dry landscape.

You can read my full review at http://dirigoendurance.com/2015/04/08/hoka-one-one-challenger-atr-review/

Alicia TRAILSPACE STAFF

Welcome to Trailspace, Brendan!


2 years ago

Where to Buy

sponsored links
Help support this site by making your next gear purchase through one of the links above. Click a link, buy what you need, and the seller will contribute a portion of the purchase price to support Trailspace's independent gear reviews.