Patagonia Drifter A/C

4 reviews
5-star:   2
4-star:   1
3-star:   1
2-star:   0
1-star:   0

Specs

Weight 1 lb 1 oz / 482 g
Width Medium
Toe Box Full
Arch / Instep Medium

Reviews

9

Patagonia's Drifter AC is a tough, comfortable, and…

Rating: rated 5 of 5 stars
Source: bought it new
Price Paid: $130

Summary

Patagonia's Drifter AC is a tough, comfortable, and well-made shoe that required no break-in time. After 120 miles of backpacking, they have fully met my expectations, and I look forward to several hundred more miles in them.

Pros

  • Nice, stiff sole
  • Almost as comfortable as my Birkenstock sandals
  • Good grip

Cons

  • Insole lacks the arch support I need

The review by my friend Rodney Buck made me wary of buying these shoes, but they were already on my feet when I pulled up his Trailspace review in the store. They felt sooooooooo good on my feet, I just had to take a chance and wear them. I don't have the narrow feet Rodney mentions, and my hiking was not going to be in the same conditions as his.

Fit: Intentionally sizing the shoes a half-size larger gave me the room I needed, as feet flatten out over longer hikes. The heel cup held my foot in place, and my toes never banged in the toe box on descents.

Comfort: Right out of the box, these shoes felt great. That comfort only increased after I replaced the stock insole with higher arch support. As a side note, I find most folks are unaware that many shoe companies skip providing a quality insole, which I find frustrating:

http://www.rei.com/learn/expert-advice/insoles.html

"The stock insoles in performance boots and shoes are typically inexpensive fillers. Most footwear manufacturers fully expect you to get aftermarket insoles to better tailor the fit, support and comfort of their footwear to your feet."

The following video spans 7 months and 120 miles. It clearly shows my satisfaction with these shoes:

Support: For the moment I first put them on, I felt the support on these shoes was greater than the Merrell Moab I have been wearing for years. I don't wear an over-the-ankle boot, as I feel I gain more from a lighter shoe.

Water Resistance: I fall into the "no waterproofing" crowd. Gortex-type boots are great, until they're not. One hiking partner slipped in a stream, and she had wet feet the rest of the day. Another partner complained that the rain was staying out, but the sweat was staying in. My shoes would get wet and would dry out within a few hours of hiking.

Traction: In 120 miles of wear, I only slipped once on a wet, moss-covered rock. This was due more to my lack of paying attention, than to the shoes' failure to grip.

Summary: I have arthritis in both knees and these shoes, with the supplemented insoles, provided the support and stability I needed to hike mostly pain free the entire week. I have found these shoes to be exactly what I need. If they fell apart today, I would feel I got my money's worth. However, I see such little wear on them, I expect to easily double, triple, even quadruple the mileage I've put on them in the months ahead.

Ashleigh MODERATOR

Nice review, Goose! Those look like some pretty sweet kicks!


4 months ago
G00SE MODERATOR

Thanks, Ashleigh. I really like these shoes.


4 months ago
rob5073

Thumbs up!


4 months ago
G00SE MODERATOR

Thanks, Rob!


4 months ago
Bentbrook

Nice job, G00SE--the "longitudinal" study time was useful since I've had some great shows that became not so great after a while. You mention the stiff sole--what is the upper limit of base weight that you'd feel comfortable toting with these shoes?


4 months ago
G00SE MODERATOR

Brent, that's a tricky question. I started with 25lbs on my weeklong. On trips of 2-4 days, I carry no more than 17lbs. But I use to carry loads of around 35-40lbs in the Merrell Moab Ventilators I mentioned, and these are superior shoes.


4 months ago
Bentbrook

Thanks, G00SE, that helps me get a sense of them.


4 months ago
PNW_John

Very informative review G00SE, I am looking for a new pair of low hikers and will give this shoe consideration. Thanks.


4 months ago
1

I really wanted to like this shoe. It didn't fit well…

Rating: rated 3 of 5 stars
Source: bought it new
Price Paid: $100

Summary

I really wanted to like this shoe. It didn't fit well on my narrow feet, which caused a lot of lifting in the heel. This could be alleviated by cranking down on the laces, but wasn't ideal. I like these because the sole was stiff enough for backpacking and scrambling on rock which my trail runners just weren't stiff enough for. After my second backpacking trip pieces of the sole started tearing off, leaving a hole in one shoes and broken tread on the other.

Pros

  • Stiff soles
  • Good feel

Cons

  • Sole did not hold up to wear
  • Fit seemed loose for a narrow foot

I bought this at REI using my dividend and a 20% off coupon. I really wanted to love these shoes. This was my first time trying Patagonia, and while I had a couple of promlems with these shoes, overall I would try Patagonia again, but not this shoe, as it just never did fit my feet right.

Fit: Shoe had a good feel to it, but the heel was always a little sloppy causing heel lift. This could be controlled somewhat by cranking down on the laces, but I never could entirely get rid of the problem. I have friends who have not had any problems with the fit, so I think it is simply a problem for people with narrow feet like myself.

Comfort: A very comfortable shoe overall, except if the laces were not tied the shoes would not stay on at all.  If I tried to slip them on to step outside they would not stay on.  Would have loved for the heel to fit a bit snugger. As I mentioned, cranking on the laces helped with the heel lift, but them they were a bit too tight on the top.

Support: The stiff sole was exactly what I was looking for in a lightweight hiker that I could wear backpacking as well.

Temp Control: I tend to have really hot feet and these shoes seemed to breathe very well, though I am used to Gortex lined boots and shoes.

Traction: Soles had great traction on slickrock, as well as trails. 

Construction & Durability: My biggest complaint is that the lugs on the sole started to break off after my first backpacking trip. When they continued to break on my second trip leaving a hole in one shoe, I finally decided to retrn them.

I used them on two weeklong backpacking trips, (In the Utah canyonlands on trails and slickrock, and in Yellowstone NP on trails) as well as on a few dayhikes over a period of 4 months.

G00SE MODERATOR

Rodney, I appreciated your review--actually read it in the store while trying these on. In the end, they felt sooooo good in the store, I decided to buy them and see what kind of mileage I get out of them. I'll post a review in a few months.


9 months ago
RodneyBuck

Yep, as I said I really wanted to love them. Fit wasn't great for me (I think it because I have narrow feet) and I can be pretty hard on shoes - I ripped a number of the lugs right off the sole on my first trip out climbing around on some rock formations in Canyonlands NP. I hope they work well for you, and they will likely hold up well, unless you really are abusive. Looking forward to hearing your review, I haven't found a good low light hiker that I like yet.


9 months ago
G00SE MODERATOR

Posted my review today.


4 months ago
madmarmot

Have you tried Vasque? They have narrow or wide variants depending on which shoe/boot you are looking at.


4 months ago
RodneyBuck

I've used Vasque boots for years. Loved the Sundowner until they changed it. I have been using the Vasque Talus WP for about 8 months, and they seem to fit pretty well. I'll have to look more closely at Vasque's lows in narrow sizes. The medium width off the shelf didn't fit well. Thanks for the heads up.


4 months ago
1

The Drifter A/C by Patagonia is an excellent trail…

Rating: rated 4.5 of 5 stars
Source: bought it new
Price Paid: $130

Summary

The Drifter A/C by Patagonia is an excellent trail shoe. It was comfortable right out of the box and required no break-in whatsoever. I've have used them for over one year and am very impressed with how well they are built.

Pros

  • Comfortable
  • Durable
  • Required no break-in

Cons

  • Rather expensive

I bought the Drifter A/C after reading a review of them in Backpacker Magazine, who gave them a great review. I've now used them for over one year and have not been disappointed.

They were comfortable right away with no break-in needed. The tread is made by Vibram and grip all types of surfaces well and so far has been very durable. I have only used them for day hikes carrying photo packs of less than 20 lbs. so I can't say how they would work on a multi-day backpacking trips with a full pack.

Their only drawback for me was the $130 that I paid for them, but so far they have been worth the money.

0

Supportive low hikers with excellent ventilation.

Rating: rated 5 of 5 stars
Source: bought it new
Price Paid: $65

Summary

Supportive low hikers with excellent ventilation.

Pros

  • Good sole stiffness
  • Comfortable footbed

Comfortable footbed with just the right amount of stiffness in the Vibram sole. I have a moderate arch and fits really well.

Took these up Pestiewa Peak in Phoenix on a 97 degree day. That trail is full of uneven foot placements and the sole stiffness was appreciated. Also ventilated very well, and feet were comfortable.