Q&A

Have a question about mountaineering boots? Get answers in the gear selection forum.

Reviews

Very light, but vulnerable and smelly (?) I came across…

Rating: rated 3 of 5 stars
Source: bought it new
Price Paid: 253 €

Summary

Very light, but vulnerable and smelly (?)

Pros

  • Light
  • One-piece leather
  • Goretex
  • Abrasion protection all around
  • Sturdy back rim for crampons

Cons

  • Abrasion protection rand not full rubber and partly coming off
  • Sole profile torn off
  • Sole thin and vulnerable for puncture and deformation

P1040771.jpg
I came across this type of shoes in Zermatt and was struck by both its characteristics, and its low price (particularly for Zermatt and Switzerland): 279 CHF/ 253 €. It also stood out by being made of  "old fashioned" one piece leather, while still appearing to be light and compact.

I did not intend to buy new boots, having bought my previous ones only two years before and being pretty satisfied with those. But I seized the opportunity, also hoping to find a better fit than my previous ones.

I have used this pair during three alpine climbs on 4000 meter peaks around there, so they have been tested just long enough to know what to expect.

I will discuss some aspects I noticed, sometimes comparing to my previous pair of boots, Garmont Tower Extreme LX GTX , and my oldest pair, Scarpa Cerro Torre.

  • Weight. My pair size 43 weighs 675 grams per boot, which is 100 grams lighter than my already light Garmonts (a great leap from the 1070 grams of my Scarpas). That difference is partially gained from actually making the boot lower (picture) and the sole thinner.

    P1040745.jpg

  • Upper. I liked the boot to be made of one-piece leather just like my Scarpas (except for the tongue), but thinner and lighter. Reason is that it does not have seams, which are weak spots on the Garmonts (I even smeared those to protect them). It also appeals to me to be able to treat them as a whole, instead of being confronted with the more composite Garmonts.
  • Fit. As always, very personal. For my fairly slim feet the basic fit seemed good. I hoped my toes would be less tortured while descending than in both my previous pairs. Unfortunately they weren’t. After some use my feet seemed to be sliding too much again while having not enough space in front of them. It is always a problem for me to find slim shoes while not being too small in size.
  • Smell. After use they seemed to be unusually smelly. That surprised me, I never noticed that with my similar Garmonts, which are also Goretex lined. And I would even expect the leather Mammuts to breathe better than the synthetic Garmonts. One other factor might be that the shopkeeper said he would spray them before my return to pick them up.
  • Protective rand. At one spot part of the rand was coming loose (picture). It turns out that only front and back of the boot’s rand is made of rubber. In between some more plastic like material is used, which is less flexible and gets worked off.

    P1040770.jpg
  • Sole. First thing I noticed about them was that parts of the profiles were torn off, or in the process of being so (picture). That’s worrying considering the amount of abuse those will have to withstand, looking at the wear of 10 years on my Scarpas (picture). The difference is that the Vibram profile on the Scarpas is WORN off, while the Michelin profile on the Mammuts is TORN off. The second thing I noticed is the base of the profile sole to be very thin (picture), which explains part of the weight difference. But makes it vulnerable for puncturing and deformation.

    P1040742.jpg
    P1040769.jpg

    P1040755.jpg

Experience

So concluding, pretty good boots for an attractive price. But I worry how long they will last. I consider contacting Mammut about the issues I already have.

KiwiKlimber

I'd love to see the photos of your Mammut's. I wear the Mammut Comfort High GTX Surround on occasion and really like them for being lightweight as well.


18 days ago
Capricorn

Hi KiwiKlimber,
There were some issues regarding the photos, but they are added now.
Thanks for your interest.




18 days ago
KiwiKlimber

Great. Thanks so much.


18 days ago
Craig Houdeshell

Do you consider this a summer boot or a three season boot? Thanks.


18 days ago
nuitsblanches

Disposable boots?! This amount of damage after only_three_ climbs...? Unless there's a manufacturing defect with the boot (not so good of its own anyway), this is unacceptable, even for a somewhat low price. I still occasionnaly take out an ancient pair of Galibier that probably have 1000 outings on them, still on the original, well worn down, Vibram sole (and original everything, but for the laces. :-) Not a fair comparison, but 3 outings is unconscionable. Thanks for the thorough review, I especially appreciated the comparison with other boots you've used, incl. side-by-side pictures.


17 days ago
apeman

Wow, so I'm wondering what attributes these boots have that warrant a 3 star rating. Most of the pros are things I would expect in any modern day hiking boot/shoe from the start. I do know that I would not trust these boots in situations where crampons were needed.


13 days ago

Where to Buy

sponsored links
Help support this site by making your next gear purchase through one of the links above. Click a link, buy what you need, and the seller will contribute a portion of the purchase price to support Trailspace's independent gear reviews.